{"id":1198,"date":"2012-01-16T18:08:22","date_gmt":"2012-01-16T07:08:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1198"},"modified":"2020-10-21T11:52:31","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T00:52:31","slug":"man-made-global-warming-is-happening-the-hockey-stick-graph-proves-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1198","title":{"rendered":"Man-made, Global Warming is happening.  The &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; graph proves it?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div dir=\"ltr\">\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?attachment_id=1202\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1202\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-large wp-image-1202\" title=\"2000 Years of Temperature - The Hockey Stick - version by James Follett\" src=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/2000-Years-of-Temperature-The-Hockey-Stick-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/2000-Years-of-Temperature-The-Hockey-Stick-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/2000-Years-of-Temperature-The-Hockey-Stick-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/2000-Years-of-Temperature-The-Hockey-Stick.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>In a nutshell, why is the central argument proving man-made, Global Warming, the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; graph, almost universally discredited?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The most emotive and pivotal evidence for catastrophic, <a title=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Global_warming\" href=\"Global Warming\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Global Warming<\/a> is the legendary, &#8220;<a title=\"The `Hockey Stick': A New Low in Climate Science\" href=\"http:\/\/www.john-daly.com\/hockey\/hockey.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Hockey Stick<\/a>&#8221; graph.&nbsp; The evidence proving Global Warming has been thinner on the ground than many would believe considering the vehemence of those you promote it.&nbsp; However, with a dearth of other evidence available, the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; was always there to wave in front of the masses.&nbsp; Without the hard Stick to do the convincing, do we still have CO2-based, Global Warming?<\/p>\n<h2>What is the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221;?<\/h2>\n<p>It shows a 1000 years or so of low stable temperatures and the last 100 of rapid increases.&nbsp; Famously in &#8220;<a title=\"An Inconvenient Truth\" href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0497116\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">An Inconvenient Truth<\/a>&#8221; Al Gore uses it to great, dramatic effect and the <a title=\"IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">IPCC<\/a> (the body of scientists promoting Global Warming) have used it as the gold standard for their Warming message.<\/p>\n<p>Most scientists, who have looked under the bonnet of the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; (famously <a title=\"Steve McIntyre\" href=\"http:\/\/climateaudit.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Steve McIntyre<\/a>), have come to the opinion that it isn&#8217;t worth its weight in salt.&nbsp; Not only could you relatively easily deem the math behind it lazy, you could claim it farcical.<\/p>\n<p>I thought the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; saga was dead and gone, but recently commentors have cited and resuscitated it as sound, valid evidence for Global Warming.&nbsp; The attrition of the validity of &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; was a slow and painful process for those involved.&nbsp; But, I think that story has come to the end of its road.&nbsp; Scientists are usually pretty poor at stats, strange but true, but, in this story, the stats won the day.&nbsp; It is reasonable to say that the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; hasn&#8217;t got a leg to stand on.<\/p>\n<h2>What&#8217;s wrong with the Hockey Stick (in just one sentence)?<\/h2>\n<p>The Hockey Stick has been pretty much universally discredited, even in the face of proponents, such as Amman and Wahl, that have tried to resuscitate it? How so?<\/p>\n<p>Basically, after years of Hockey Stick criticism, <a title=\"Ammann and Wahl \u2013 July 2005 Review\" href=\"http:\/\/climateaudit.org\/2006\/03\/09\/ammann-and-wahl-july-2005-review\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Amman and Wahl<\/a> in 2005 tried to publish a few papers defending it however within one of them they let the cat out of the bag&#8230;<\/p>\n<div style=\"background: #EFEFF0; display: inline; float: left; width: 580px; margin: 30px 30px;\">\n<p><strong>&#8220;buried deep within the paper, Amman and Wahl had quietly revealed their verification r<sup>2<\/sup> figures, which were, just as McIntyre had predicted, close to zero for most of the reconstruction, strongly suggesting that the hockey stick had little predictive power.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/bishophill.squarespace.com\/blog\/2008\/8\/11\/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html\">Caspar and the Jesus&nbsp;paper<\/a>&#8221; (by &#8220;Bishop Hill&#8221;, an awesome blog where the convoluted becomes crystal clear)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>This one sentence shows us that the statistics underlying the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; were fudged and manipulated.&nbsp; As is normal scientific practice, Steve McIntyre (et al) <a title=\"Hockey stick controversy\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hockey_stick_controversy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">badgered<\/a> (err, requested) the authors of the Hockey Stick (esp. the progenitor <a title=\"Michael Mann\" href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2004\/12\/michael-mann\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Michael Mann<\/a>) to disclose their methods.&nbsp; After 5 years of pursuit, Amman and Wahl quietly slipped the magic number out (the <a title=\"Coefficient of determination\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Coefficient_of_determination\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">r<sup>2<\/sup><\/a>).&nbsp; They were probably, unwillingly forced to disclose this information as a prerequisite for their paper being published.&nbsp; Consequently, this magic number, the coefficient of determination (r<sup>2<\/sup>), was finally released.&nbsp; With a r<sup>2<\/sup> close to &#8220;0&#8221;,&nbsp; this finally and unequivocally proved the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; was no only baseless, but also decidedly misleading.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s 40<sup>o<\/sup>C outside and boiling hot in here.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#8217;m off to turn my rumbling air conditioner on full&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a nutshell, why is the central argument proving man-made, Global Warming, the &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; graph, almost universally discredited? The most emotive and pivotal evidence for catastrophic, Global Warming is the legendary, &#8220;Hockey Stick&#8221; graph.&nbsp; The evidence proving Global Warming &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1198\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[163,165,161,167,164,166,162,168],"class_list":["post-1198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-drivers","tag-amman-and-wahl","tag-bishop-hill","tag-hockey-stick","tag-little-predictive-power","tag-michael-mann","tag-r2-0","tag-steve-mcintyre","tag-summary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1198"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2070,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1198\/revisions\/2070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}