{"id":1682,"date":"2013-04-10T23:32:09","date_gmt":"2013-04-10T13:32:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1682"},"modified":"2020-10-21T11:51:12","modified_gmt":"2020-10-21T00:51:12","slug":"socialism-bankrupted-britain-maggie-saved-it-and-socialists-resent-her-ever-since","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1682","title":{"rendered":"Socialism bankrupted Britain, Maggie saved it, and Socialists have resented her ever since"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?attachment_id=1709\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1709\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1709\" alt=\"Margaret Thatcher Banner\" src=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Margaret-Thatcher-Banner1.jpg\" width=\"640\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Margaret-Thatcher-Banner1.jpg 640w, https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Margaret-Thatcher-Banner1-300x117.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><strong>Margaret Thatcher was no saint, but honestly, who really <strong>ever <\/strong>is; especially, in power-mongering politics.&nbsp; She came to power in &#8217;79 as a raging bull and left, some would say, surplus-to-requirements in &#8217;90.&nbsp; However, don&#8217;t forget her impressive, early legacy&#8230;<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Where no less than 3 British, Prime Ministers tried and failed,&nbsp;<a title=\"Margaret Thatcher\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Margaret_Thatcher\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Maggie Thatcher<\/a> succeeded.&nbsp; Her predecessors couldn&#8217;t clean up the utter mess that post-World War 2, socialism-on-steroids made of Britain.&nbsp; The social welfare state had become too indulgent and public spending was out-of-control.&nbsp; By the late 70s, Britain was in a state of economic ruin and shutdown.&nbsp; Maggie did the clean job up, the very necessary clean up job, perhaps, some would say, a hatchet job.&nbsp; However, where others failed, she succeeded and has been hated for saving the economy, by many, ever since.<\/p>\n<p>What has been the public response to Margaret Thatcher&#8217;s death? Well, the Wizard of OZ song &#8216;<a title=\"'Ding Dong! The Witch Is Dead' could reach number one following Margaret Thatcher's death\" href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/arts-entertainment\/music\/news\/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead-could-reach-number-one-following-margaret-thatchers-death-8566042.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Ding Dong! The Witch Is Dead<\/a>&#8216; is climbing up to the No. 1 spot, for one.&nbsp; Apparently, a large portion of the nation is heaving a deep sigh of relief that Thatcherism is finally and unequivocally &#8220;dead and buried&#8221;.&nbsp; But, look back, why did the nation vote her in 3 times in a row, who were those rogue voters, if we are all seeming to be rejoicing in her demise?&nbsp; In her day, she was very popular, perhaps memories act like sieves at times?<strong><br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Regardless, Maggie Thatcher must be smiling with Machiavellian glee in her grave.&nbsp; She is still managing to extract bile and venom from her arch, political rivals, the Left Wing.&nbsp; The unbridled dislike and, even rage, that her name still conjurers 23 years after she left office must provide her with a smug sense of a job well done.&nbsp; She always was the consummate politician; a real pit fighter.&nbsp; Maggie really was the last, great, Conservative leader.&nbsp; She changed the fundamental philosophy of governance of Britain, and in cahoots with her great <a title=\"Margaret Thatcher: Reagan's Most Resolute Ally\" href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/articles\/2013\/04\/09\/margaret_thatcher_reagans_most_resolute_ally__117862.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">friend,<\/a> President Ronald Reagan, to the world as a whole.&nbsp; Since her demise as Britain&#8217;s leader, politicians around the Western world have eschewed partisan politics.&nbsp; Most have clambered to embrace the wishy-washy, populist, fence sitting of the <a title=\"Why \u2018hung\u2019 parliaments and coalitions are normal in western Europe\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.lse.ac.uk\/politicsandpolicy\/archives\/2114\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Centre<\/a>.&nbsp; She has been a major factor in the destruction of both Right and (transparent) Left wing politics.&nbsp; I say &#8220;transparent&#8221; for the Left as the Left Wing is still very much Left leaning.&nbsp; They just hide behind rhetoric of the Centre.&nbsp; The socialist, <a title=\"Statism\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Statism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Statist<\/a> agenda of the Left is very much live and kicking.&nbsp; It&#8217;s pathfinders like ex-Prime Minister, Tony Blair, who just repackaged the same old philosophy into a much more palatable <a title=\"New Labour, New Life For Britain\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_Labour,_New_Life_For_Britain\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">New Labour<\/a> style.&nbsp; Labour&#8217;s agenda never really changed, it just became more subtle and sophisticated.&nbsp; They push Statism through uncomprehendable, non-transparent mechanisms such as the hugely costly and fruitless <a title=\"High cost and nil effect: that's our carbon tax\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theaustralian.com.au\/national-affairs\/opinion\/high-cost-and-nil-effect-thats-our-carbon-tax\/story-e6frgd0x-1226419362001\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Carbon Tax<\/a>.&nbsp; But, I digress.&nbsp; The point is, no self-respecting, populist politico would veer to one &#8220;extreme&#8221; or tother for fear of voicing a real opinion and becoming, heaven forbid, accountable.&nbsp; As Mitt Romney famously <a title=\"Mitt Romney's &quot;47 Percent&quot; Comments\" href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=M2gvY2wqI7M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">said<\/a> during the U.S., 2012, Presidential election, 47% of Americans won&#8217;t vote for me anyway, they are net, state welfare dependents and won&#8217;t vote for tax cuts.&nbsp; In general though, both sides of the House are fighting for the swing voters in the Centre whether by false rhetoric (Left) or desperation (Right).<\/p>\n<p>So, I would claim Maggie was instrumental in the destruction of partisan politics.&nbsp; The West is riddled with <a title=\"Has Australia's hung Parliament been unworkable?\" href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/news\/2013-03-18\/hung-parliament-australia\/4574884\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">hung parliaments<\/a>, with marginal, minor league parities selling their deciding votes to the highest bidder.&nbsp; Thatcher was the last great and successful risk taker.&nbsp; I&#8217;m Right wing, take it or leave it.&nbsp; As stated in the Standard book of Left wing campaigning (Saul Alinsky&#8217;s <a title=\"Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rules_for_Radicals\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Rules for Radicals<\/a>), you&#8217;re standard ripost to dissenting voices is to demonise the person.&nbsp; Use ad hominen attacks on the person to&nbsp;besmirch their reputation, create unpopularity and avoid, at all costs, real debate.&nbsp; So, this juvenile, but successful, tactic has made Maggie the evil, destructor <a title=\"The Iron Maiden (Margaret Thatcher) is Dead\" href=\"http:\/\/www.deliberation.info\/the-iron-maiden-thatcher-is-dead\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Iron Maiden<\/a> (not just Iron Lady) with images of swastikas behind her.<\/p>\n<p>I agree by her third and final term, the Iron Lady (as <a title=\"Iron Lady\" href=\"http:\/\/russiapedia.rt.com\/on-this-day\/january-24\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">coined<\/a> by a Russian newspaper when she criticised the Soviet Block in &#8217;76) was becoming a bit stayed.&nbsp; Perhaps, her alternative to &#8220;socialism-on-steroids&#8221;, &#8220;capitalism-on-steroids&#8221; was just as out-of-control as its predecessor.&nbsp; Capitalism lead to notable failures such as the <a title=\"How Black Monday sowed the seeds for the current financial crisis\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/business\/2012\/oct\/14\/black-monday-sowed-seeds-financial-crisis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Black Monday<\/a> financial collapse of &#8217;87 (which, as it happens, bankrupted my dad).&nbsp; Perhaps then, describing her reign as just &#8220;stayed&#8221; is a tad generous.&nbsp; Even her own Party eventually deemed her a &#8220;<a title=\"Margaret Thatcher's resignation: A career that did not die in vain\" href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/comment\/columnists\/charlesmoore\/8150464\/Margaret-Thatchers-resignation-A-career-that-did-not-die-in-vain.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">liability<\/a>&#8220;?&nbsp; Moreover, when Thatcher proposed the hugely unpopular <a title=\"Community Charge\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Community_Charge\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Poll Tax <\/a>in&#8217;89, that was the straw that broke the camel&#8217;s back for many.&nbsp; That was never going to fly.&nbsp; The Poll Tax was a local authority, single flat-rate, per-capita tax on every adult; no sliding scale determined by wealth.&nbsp; That was just a little too Right Wing for even the generally pro-Thatcher Brits to palate, and rightfully so.<\/p>\n<p>However, all-in-all, she was a great; Winston Churchill, the last great, would be proud.&nbsp; She saved a desperate, sinking country (as he did 40 years earlier).<\/p>\n<p>Many of the British, video Obituaries I&#8217;m watching are a bit cagey about Thatcher&#8217;s record. So I&#8217;ll opt for the foreign perspective, which are generally for some bizarre reason, more sympathetic.&nbsp; Here&#8217;s Al Jazeera&#8217;s effort <em>[edit: this was removed a few days later, so here&#8217;s the CNN effort]<\/em>:<\/p>\n<h2>Obituary<\/h2>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Eq1zzLkSUPg\" allowfullscreen=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Thatcher&#8217;s Legacy:<\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3><strong>Falklands War<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?attachment_id=1717\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1717\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1717\" alt=\"FALKLANDS_THIRTY_00_small\" src=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/FALKLANDS_THIRTY_00_small.jpg\" width=\"634\" height=\"385\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/FALKLANDS_THIRTY_00_small.jpg 634w, https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/FALKLANDS_THIRTY_00_small-300x182.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 634px) 100vw, 634px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The <a title=\"The Falklands War: An Overview\" href=\"http:\/\/militaryhistory.about.com\/od\/battleswars1900s\/p\/falklands.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Falklands War<\/a> of&nbsp; &#8217;82 was a huge success for Margaret Thatcher and for the nation as a whole.&nbsp; Britain was a country in severe recession, with no &#8220;Great&#8221; left to justify its once illustrious name.&nbsp; The weakened British empire was taken for a ride by a equally weak and floundering dictator, General <a title=\"Leopoldo Galtieri\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Leopoldo_Galtieri\">Leopoldo Galtieri<\/a> of Argentina.&nbsp; He believed the British had no stomach left, or pride for that matter, and decided to take for Argentina something that never had been there&#8217;s, the Falkland Islands <a title=\"Timeline of the history of the Falkland Islands\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Timeline_of_the_history_of_the_Falkland_Islands\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">colony<\/a>.&nbsp; If the home situation is looking tenuous, standard,&nbsp;military dictator practice is to unite the country against a common, foreign enemy; enter stage left, Britain and the piggy in the middle, the Falklands Islands.&nbsp; The conflict is a huge story unto its own.&nbsp; However, I would like to mention that this long-shot win for Maggie was more than just that.&nbsp; It was a huge win for British national pride as a whole.&nbsp; Ironically, the foreign affairs fracas was used as a tactic by General Galtieri to solve his domestic woes, but instead it destroyed him and secured his foes leadership.&nbsp;&nbsp;The win was a very important seed sown by Maggie to garner support for her own highly contentious, domestic, economic reforms.&nbsp; The fact that a close friend of mine, who survived the horrors of the hand-to-hand fighting of the Battle of <a title=\"Battle of Goose Green\" href=\"http:\/\/www.historylearningsite.co.uk\/battle_goose_green.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Goose Green<\/a>, is, in principle, anti-Falklands War these days is very lamentable.&nbsp; The anti-Maggie, Leftist ad hominen machine has been effective over the years.&nbsp; He, like many I know, believe the war to be an unjustifiable sham.&nbsp; A shame on British; selfish Imperialism.&nbsp; This is totally untrue.&nbsp; He should be very proud of his own achievements and what his actions stood for.&nbsp; Britain was not the aggressor and the Falklands were a pawn for a desperate dictator on the verge of over-throw by his own people.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>Winter of Discontent<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?attachment_id=1719\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1719\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-1719\" alt=\"miners1_big\" src=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/miners1_big.jpg\" width=\"640\" height=\"434\" srcset=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/miners1_big.jpg 640w, https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/miners1_big-300x203.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #efeff0; display: inline; float: left; width: 580px; margin: 30px;\">Now is the <strong>winter of our discontent<\/strong><br \/>\nMade glorious summer by this sun of York;<br \/>\nAnd all the clouds that lour\u2019d upon our house<br \/>\nIn the deep bosom of the ocean buried.<br \/>\n<strong>Shakespeare&#8217;s, Richard III, Act 1 Scene 1<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>You know your country is in proper strife when it&#8217;s forced into a <a title=\"Your 1970s: Strikes and blackouts\" href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/magazine\/6729683.stm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">3 day week<\/a>.&nbsp; During the infamous &#8220;<a title=\"Winter of Discontent\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Winter_of_Discontent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Winter of Discontent<\/a>&#8221; (this term parodies Shakespeare&#8217;s Richard III) of &#8217;78 the UK was properly up shit creek without even a tooth pick to paddle with.&nbsp; We were for all intents and purposes a Soviet-style state with a veneer of democratic elections.&nbsp; The whole economy was dominated by socialism, unions, nepotism and government control.&nbsp; Needless to say, inflation was rampant at <a title=\"Margaret Thatcher\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Margaret_Thatcher\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">18%<\/a> and government spending out of control.&nbsp; 1-0 to the trade unions, who prevented wage caps and any other attempts at sensible, fiscal tightening.&nbsp; There were widespread strikes by public sector, trade unions demanding even larger pay rises.&nbsp; These union strikes, predominantly in winter, hence the &#8220;Winter of Discontent&#8221;, were in protest to the ongoing pay caps of the Labour Party government, led by <a title=\"James Callaghan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Callaghan\">James Callaghan<\/a>.&nbsp; Labour is, and especially was, in those days, the political wing of the unions.&nbsp; The Labour Party was the voice, the unions, the funds.&nbsp; They are two arms attached to the same body.&nbsp; So, any Labour Party driven, pay cuts to union members was deemed treacherous.&nbsp; Top marks to Labour Prime Minister, Callaghan, for trying such a bold move against his own power base.&nbsp; However, he paid the highest price and suffered the loss of his lofty position.&nbsp; We, the once industrious and illustrious British Empire, were 110% bankrupt and there was no way out.&nbsp; He realised this and boldly tried, but regrettably, failed to rectify this.&nbsp; Both Labour and Conservative Prime Ministers, one after the other, and in quick succession, went to the chopping block trying to rein in the public spending between &#8217;75 and &#8217;79:&nbsp; <a title=\"Edward Heath\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Edward_Heath\">Edward Heath<\/a> gone, <a title=\"Harold Wilson\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Harold_Wilson\">Harold Wilson<\/a> gone,&nbsp; <a title=\"James Callaghan\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Callaghan\">James Callaghan<\/a> gone. &nbsp;No one was able to get us out of the economic and social funk.&nbsp; It required a working class, Northern, lass, with vision, to kick start us out of the never-ending poverty and doldrums.&nbsp; Britain was in poverty; unionised poverty.&nbsp; Protecting workers rights is important, agreed, and there was good reason unions were formed in the &#8220;<a title=\"'Dark satanic' call centres: Strike by civil servants who moan their air-conditioned offices are as grim as 19th-century factories\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-1377457\/Call-centre-civil-servants-strike-dark-satanic-working-conditions.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">dark, satanic mills<\/a>&#8221; of the Industrial Revolution.&nbsp; However, there&#8217;s fair wage and there&#8217;s down-right economic extortion.&nbsp; The battle lines were drawn; hard working and honest miners were to be the casualties.&nbsp; It took Maggie 4 years to break the miners strike, she tried in &#8217;81, lost, then in &#8217;84, won.&nbsp; She was better prepared the second time around.&nbsp; For one she had stockpiled the coal for the all-important, power stations.&nbsp; This time she was up against Arthur Scargill, the president of the <a title=\"National Union of Mineworkers (Great Britain)\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/National_Union_of_Mineworkers_%28Great_Britain%29\">National Union of Mineworkers<\/a>.&nbsp; Thatcher, without enacting any draconian, anti-strike laws, finally broke the year long strike in &#8217;85.&nbsp; This was the catalyst to the Grand Plan of opening up the economy to innovation.&nbsp; She dropped the <a title=\"Prime Minister Thatcher's Economic Policies\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fsmitha.com\/h2\/ch37-thatcher.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">taxes<\/a> (in real terms) and stopped the brain drain abroad.&nbsp; She put the &#8220;Great&#8221; back into Britain.&nbsp; The economic engine was kick-started and national optimism restored.&nbsp; Hence, even one of her arch nemeses, <a title=\"Roy Hattersley\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Roy_Hattersley\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Roy Hattersley<\/a>, deputy leader of the Labour party from &#8217;83 to &#8217;92, gives her credence in his obituary to her.&nbsp; Hats off to Hattersley for being an old school gentleman:<\/p>\n<p style=\"background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% #efeff0; display: inline; float: left; width: 580px; margin: 30px;\">&#8220;Thatcher was one of the two greatest prime ministers of the 20th century&#8221;<br \/>\n<strong>Roy Hattersley, deputy leader of the Labour party from 1983 to 1992<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is one of those we love to hate.&nbsp; Reading today all the <a title=\"Margaret Thatcher dies: tributes pour in for influential but divisive leader\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/politics\/2013\/apr\/08\/margaret-thatcher-dies-tributes-pour\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">obituaries<\/a> about her from various politicians from various persuasions around the world has been very insightful.&nbsp; I feel their sentiments, whether reverential from Right wingers or thinly veiled digs by many Left wingers is indicative of the people they represent.&nbsp; The Left say comments like they admire her for being the first, female, British leader, but taint any support with mentioning her somewhat &#8220;divisive&#8221; nature.&nbsp; The Right laud her for bringing free-market capitalism to Britain and saving the British economy.<\/p>\n<p>They are both right.<\/p>\n<p>She was divisive and she was a pioneering <a title=\"Prime Minister Thatcher's Economic Policies\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fsmitha.com\/h2\/ch37-thatcher.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">capitalist<\/a> of the <a title=\"Friedrich Hayek\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Friedrich_Hayek\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Hayek<\/a> and <a title=\"Who Was Milton Friedman?\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nybooks.com\/articles\/archives\/2007\/feb\/15\/who-was-milton-friedman\/?pagination=false\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Friedman<\/a> schools of economics.&nbsp; Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not an unequivocal fan of <a title=\"Friedman and free banking\" href=\"http:\/\/www.freebanking.org\/2012\/07\/31\/friedman-and-free-banking\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">free-market<\/a> Banking and believer in &#8220;<a title=\"Gordon Gekko\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gordon_Gekko\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">greed is good<\/a>&#8220;.&nbsp; However, warts and all, it&#8217;s the best system we have.&nbsp; True, &#8220;divisive&#8221;, read having a strong opinion, is not currently, very popular.&nbsp;&nbsp; Weak, coalition governments and &#8220;consensus&#8221; politics in much more the norm.&nbsp; But, being opinionated can be a good thing at times.&nbsp; Consensus has its place, but sometimes hard decisions have to be made and that requires force of will and radical conviction.&nbsp; Thatcherism may well have run out of steam by the end of her tenure.&nbsp; But, remember her for earlier glories.&nbsp; She was the only woman, in a vehemently man&#8217;s world, to be able to break the stifling stranglehold of the unions and allow Britain to reclaim the prefix, &#8220;Great&#8221;.&nbsp; Where many others failed, she succeeded.&nbsp; She rescued Britain from the brink of the economic abyss and made her industrious once more.&nbsp; Not perfect, true, casualties yes, but eminently better that the economic wasteland it was.&nbsp; We have much to be thankful for.<\/p>\n<h3>There is no shirking from the oft-forgotten fact: Socialism bankrupted Britain.&nbsp; Socialism created the mass poverty and sowed the seed for mass, <a title=\"The Economy of the 1970s \" href=\"http:\/\/econ.economicshelp.org\/2010\/02\/economy-of-1970s.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">trade union<\/a> striking.&nbsp; Long-term, out-of-control, governmental handouts to cronies such as the unions created Britain&#8217;s woes.&nbsp; Maggie didn&#8217;t destroy the mining communities, ultimately, the union bosses did.&nbsp; Many people have always resented her for the strikes.&nbsp; However, the blame lies squarely on the fiscal recklessness of the Labour movement.&nbsp; The green grocer&#8217;s daughter from <a title=\"Margaret Thatcher\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Margaret_Thatcher\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Up North<\/a> did the hatchet job to fix up a Socialist, social problem and has taken the blame ever since.<\/h3>\n<p>Interestingly, when Labour&#8217;s Tony Blair finally came to power in &#8217;97, and he had a chance to radically, reverse her policies, he didn&#8217;t &#8211; the essence of Thatcherism, foibles and all, <a title=\"The lady who changed the world \" href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/blighty\/2013\/04\/margaret-thatcher\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">lives on<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Margaret Thatcher was no saint, but honestly, who really ever is; especially, in power-mongering politics.&nbsp; She came to power in &#8217;79 as a raging bull and left, some would say, surplus-to-requirements in &#8217;90.&nbsp; However, don&#8217;t forget her impressive, early legacy&#8230; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/?p=1682\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107],"tags":[262,264,260,258,261,257,259,248,263],"class_list":["post-1682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-theory","tag-falklands-war","tag-free-thought","tag-legacy","tag-margaret-thatcher","tag-miners-strike","tag-prime-minister","tag-right-wing","tag-socialism","tag-winter-of-discontent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1682"}],"version-history":[{"count":49,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2062,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1682\/revisions\/2062"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/climatereview.net\/ChewTheFat\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}